Icon Literatur
Icon Zeitschriftenbeitrag

Dokumentart(en): Zeitschriftenbeitrag Forschungsergebnis
Titel der Veröffentlichung: Generic patient-reported outcomes in child health research: A review of conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions

Autor/in:

Fayed, Nora; de Camargo, Olaf Kraus; Kerr, Elizabeth [u. a.]

Herausgeber/in:

National Spastics Society; American Academy for Cerebral Palsy; British Paediatric Neurology Association [u. a.]

Quelle:

Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2012, Volume 54 (Issue 12), Seite 1085-1095, Oxford: Blackwell, ISSN: 0012-1622, eISSN: 1469-8749

Jahr:

2012

Der Text ist von:
Fayed, Nora; de Camargo, Olaf Kraus; Kerr, Elizabeth [u. a.]

Der Text steht in der Zeitschrift:
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, Volume 54 (Issue 12), Seite 1085-1095

Den Text gibt es seit:
2012

Wo bekommen Sie den Text?

Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14698749

Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14698749

Um Literatur zu beziehen, wenden Sie sich bitte an eine Bibliothek, die Herausgebenden, den Verlag oder an den Buch- und Zeitschriftenhandel.

Generic patient-reported outcomes in child health research: A review of conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions

Aim:

Our aims were to
(1) describe the conceptual basis of popular generic instruments according to World Health Organization (WHO) definitions of functioning, disability, and health (FDH), and quality of life (QOL) with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as a subcomponent of QOL;
(2) map the instruments to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF); and
(3) provide information on how the analyzed instruments were used in the literature. This should enable users to make valid choices about which instruments have the desired content for a specific context or purpose.

Method:

Child health-based literature over a 5-year period was reviewed to find research employing health status and QOL/HRQOL instruments. WHO definitions of FDH and QOL were applied to each item of the 15 most used instruments to differentiate measures of FDH and QOL/HRQOL. The ICF was used to describe the health and health-related content (if any) in those instruments. Additional aspects of instrument use were extracted from these articles.

Results:

Many instruments that were used to measure QOL/HRQOL did not reflect WHO definitions of QOL. The ICF domains within instruments were highly variable with respect to whether body functions, activities and participation, or environment were emphasized.

Interpretation:

There is inconsistency among researchers about how to measure HRQOL and QOL. Moreover, when an ICF content analysis is applied, there is variability among instruments in the health components included and emphasized. Reviewing content is important for matching instruments to their intended purpose.

Referenznummer:

R/ZA5033

Informationsstand: 24.08.2012