Icon Literatur
Icon Zeitschriftenbeitrag

Dokumentart(en): Zeitschriftenbeitrag Forschungsergebnis
Titel der Veröffentlichung: Self-reported disability according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Low Back Pain Core Set: Test-retest agreement and reliability

Bibliographische Angaben

Autor/in:

Bagraith, Karl S.; Strong, Jenny; Meredith, Pamela J. [u. a.]

Herausgeber/in:

American Association on Health and Disability

Quelle:

Disability and Health Journal, 2017, 10(4), Seite 621-626, New York: Elsevier, ISSN: 1936-6574

Jahr:

2017

Der Text ist von:
Bagraith, Karl S.; Strong, Jenny; Meredith, Pamela J. [u. a.]

Der Text steht in der Zeitschrift:
Disability and Health Journal, 10(4), Seite 621-626

Den Text gibt es seit:
2017

Inhaltliche Angaben

Wo bekommen Sie den Text?

Disability and Health Journal
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/disability-and-health-...

Weitere Informationen zur Veröffentlichung

Disability and Health Journal
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/disability-and-health-...

Um Literatur zu beziehen, wenden Sie sich bitte an eine Bibliothek, die Herausgebenden, den Verlag oder an den Buch- und Zeitschriftenhandel.

Self-reported disability according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Low Back Pain Core Set: Test-retest agreement and reliability

Background:
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Low Back Pain Core Set (LBP-CS) has been proposed as a tool to facilitate the description and measurement of chronic low back pain (CLBP) related disability. Patient ratings of ICF categories may serve as a practical and effective method for acquiring patient input on activity limitations and participation restrictions.
Objective:
To investigate the test-retest agreement and reliability of patient ratings of activity and participation according to the LBP-CS.
Methods:
A cross-sectional repeated-measures questionnaire study was undertaken with thirty-one medically stable adults with CLBP who presented for treatment at two public Australian hospitals. Participants completed the LBP-CS Self-Report Checklist (LBP-CS-SRC) on two occasions (mean = 12.5 (SD = 4.5) days between administrations). The LBP-CS-SRC permits patients to self-rate their functioning according to the LBP-CS activity and participation categories and enables the derivation of activity limitation and participation restriction scales.
Results:
Patient ratings of individual LBP-CS categories generally exhibited good - excellent test-retest agreement (percentage exact agreement: 74.19-100.00%) and reliability (kappa: 0.53-1.00). The test-retest reliability coefficients of the LBP-CS-SRC activity (ICC = 0.94) and participation (ICC = 0.90) scales were excellent. The minimum detectable change values for the activity and participation scales were 8.11 and 15.26, respectively.
Conclusions:
This study is the first to demonstrate that patients can provide reliable ratings of functioning using the LBP-CS. The LBP-CS-SRC was shown to be acceptably reliable and precise to support understanding of patients' perspectives on disability in rehabilitation practice and research.

Referenznummer:

R/ZA8518

Informationsstand: 12.04.2017